The planned Covanta Waste Incinerator at Stewartby

I have been trying to understand the science behind the proposed Covanta Waste Incinerator at Stewartby.  I must confess, I am perplexed.  I would have thought that, if one burnt carbon based waste, one would generate carbon dioxide (CO2).

According to a Wikipedia article on the subject, combustion, or burning, is a sequence of exothermic chemical reactions between a fuel and an oxidant, accompanied by the production of heat and conversion of chemical species.  In my understanding, most fuels are carbon based and the gases produced by combustion contain a large amount of carbon dioxide.  I would imagine that much of the waste material to be burnt at the Covanta incinerator would be carbon based too.  I would imagine that burning it would generate a huge amount of carbon dioxide.

I know for a fact that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas.  The carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which, before man started to produce it on an industrial scale, was augmented by volcanos and forest fires, has had a profound effect on the earth’s climate since the dawn of time.  When the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is increased the earth’s temperature increases.  This effect is known as the greenhouse effect.

Knowing all this, I would have imagined that the proposed Stewartby Incinerator would generate a huge amount of carbon dioxide, along with small quantities of other more pernicious and poisonous gases, and that it would have a very damaging effect on global warming, as well as a very damaging effect on the air quality in Stewartby, Bedford, Ampthill, Flitwick and the surrounding villages.

I would have thought that a giant waste incinerator in Stewartby would do a huge amount of environmental and ecological damage.  The newspaper reports seem to be telling me this isn’t so.  For example:  There was an article in The Independant newspaper, on Sunday 1st August, entitled: UK may have to import rubbish for incinerators.  This article describes the damage incinerators can do.  However, the last paragraph of the article quotes a Defra spokesman who seems to be telling us that generating electricity by burning waste is a good thing.

I would like to say I understand all the discussions of this matter in the media.  Regrettably, I do not.  All I know for sure is that I do not like this proposal.  If I ask myself the question: “If I could afford to leave Bedford, were this project to go ahead, would I do so?”  The answer is yes.  I would be sorry to leave.  I have made a lot of very good friends in Bedford, since I came here in April 2006.  However, I would not trust the air quality in Bedford if I had a giant waste incinerator on my doorstep.  This would especially be the case if the incinerator was working 24 hours a day, seven days a week, as this one is expected to do.

What is more, the area around Stewartby and Marston Vale is fast becoming an area of great natural beauty.  Do we really want to see this spoilt with the building of some dark, satanic mill right in the centre of it?  We have the wonderful Millennium Country Park. in Marston Moretaine.  We have the Ampthill Forest and the beautiful Maulden Wood.  These areas are encouraging (and preserving) a wonderful array of native flora and fauna.  These areas could become a wonderful tourist resource, as well as remaining a source of refreshment, relaxation and recuperation for the residents of Bedford, Flitwick, Amptill, Clophill and Maulden.  Do we really want to see this wonderful area of natural beauty destroyed with the sight of, and the fumes from, some gigantic waste incinerator?  I know what my answer is.  My answer is no.

I am not the only one who thinks this waste incinerator is a very bad idea.  Here are some links to other people and organisations who feel the same way, people and organisations who are fighting to stop this plan from going ahead:

The Marston Moreteyne Action Group

The Facebook page for residents against the Covanta Incinerator at Stewartby

Tim Hill – Liberal Democrat Councillor for Wootton, Stewartby and Kempston Hardwick

I would like to join them in opposing this scheme.  I would urge you to do the same.

Share
Comments
  • One of the reasons the carbon dioxide, which would be generated by a waste incinerator, is so often discounted from the calculations of the incinerator’s environmental impact, is that the methane which is generated by landfill is worse.

    Perhaps the answer to this problem is to recover the menthane which is generated, and to store it elsewhere, so that it can be used as fuel. In the act of using the methane as fuel, it will be burnt, in other words, it will be subjected to the process of combustion. Combustion is a chemical process. Once this combustion is complete, the methane will no longer be methane. Thus we have two advantages from recovering the methane produced by landfil.

    1) We remove a harmful greenhouse gas.

    2) We gain energy / fuel.

    The fuel thus obtained, could be used to power transport. Perhaps it could be used to power some of Bedford’s public transport?

  • leo ashmore says:

    Oh My God.
    Just as we begin to breath some cleaner air with the demise of
    Brickmaking , The Snouts In The Trough Brigade seem keen to invade
    our Respiratory Systems with sinister substances.
    Surely Bedfordshire has had its fair share of Rubbish over the years.
    Maybe its time for the Clowns in charge to cast an eye at the
    Packaging Industry.
    Please give the grass a chance to grow.

  • Nadine Dorries recently organised a public meeting to protest about this “Dark Satanic Mill”. You can find details of the meeting on her blog at web address:

    http://blog.dorries.org/

    I have also built a web page of my own to complain about the matter. You can find that here:

    http://www.richardgillard.webs.com/WhyIDoNotWantCovanta.html

    There will also be another public meeting, to be addressed by Professor Paul Connect, at The Rufus Centre, in Flitick, at 10:30 AM on Saturday 30 October. If you are interested in this matter, I would urge you to come along.

    Best Wishes

    Richard Gillard

  • I have been idly speculating about how much solar power could be generated, if an area around the proposed site of the Covanta Incinerator were covered in solar panels. I do not have a deep understanding of the science of solar power. However, using some information taken from the world wide web, I was playing around with some figures to see if the amount of solar energy falling on a small slice of the area around Stewartby could possibly equal the proposed power output of the Covanta Incinerator. My sums tell me that it could, although I fear I might be missing something. If anyone can comment on the following assumptions, please do so. Here are my musings on the subject:

    Let us imagine an area of, say 3km by 4km, covered in solar panels. This would be an area of 12,000,000 square metres. The World Meteorological Organization uses the term “sunshine duration” to mean the cumulative time during which an area receives direct irradiance from the Sun of at least 120 watts per square meter (see: http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/IMOP/publications/CIMO-Guide/CIMO%20Guide%207th%20Edition,%202008/Part%20I/Chapter%208.pdf). This means that the total solar power falling on our hyperthetical area is 1440 Megawatts. This is 22 times the maximum power output of the proposed Covanta incinerator, which would be 65 Megawatts.

    Now, we must consider that following facts: The sun does not shine 24 hours per day, neither should we expect a 100% efficiency in the conversion of this solar energy into electricity. Consequently, the total average output would be a mere fraction of this 1440 Megawatts of solar energy falling on our hyperthetical installation while the sunshines. Nevertheless, even if we take a fraction of one quarter of this solar energy, we still have 360 Megawatts, which is 5.5 times the projected output of the Covanta Incinerator.

    What is the advantage of solar power? Well, it does not need any heavy lorries to carry fuel to the solar plant. The sun shines every day. Neither are any heavy lorries needed to remove waste products or take away the power generated. The energy feeds straight into the national grid and no waste products result from the conversion of solar energy. Neither, are solar panels particularly unsightly, since they can have a very low profile. Best of all, they do not release any harmful products into the atmosphere.

    References:

    Chapter 8 of the Commision for Instruments and Methods of Observation (CIMO) Guide, 7th edition, which can be found on the World Meterological Organization website at web address:

    http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/IMOP/publications/CIMO-Guide/CIMO_Guide-7th_Edition-2008.html

    and specifically:

    http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/IMOP/publications/CIMO-Guide/CIMO%20Guide%207th%20Edition,%202008/Part%20I/Chapter%208.pdf

    The following pages on Wikipedia:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_panel
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunlight

    The website of First Solar, Inc of Temp Arizona, at web address:

    http://www.firstsolar.com/en/index.php

  • Lee Mullins says:

    Something that hasn’t been mentioned is the dangers of the release of poisonous gases from the proposed incinerator. PCP’s in particular cause chlorachne and cancers! Just what’s needed around Bedford!

  • Jonny says:

    Well well well, I’ve lost my bearings big time.

    Great idea, will definitely blend in with the beautiful Bedfordshire countryside, thumbs up from me!!! :D <3 xxx

  • Ben Lawrence says:

    Everyone come to my house at 8pm on the 4th December for a protest round the forest centre, there will be free refreshments!

  • Sue Kemp says:

    just a note in case anyone finds this article at a later date – we are now in December 2011…

    Please find our action group on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/groups/residentsagainstcovanta/

    Professor Paul Connett who is an expert on waste management and the environment confirms that incineration is as dangerous as we anticipated last year – find videos of his talks on youtube..

    For the sake of all the people of Bedfordshire – especially the very young and yet unborn – we have to fight this development.

    Zero waste is the way forward – far superior to the so called “Energy from Waste”…

    Thank you – see you on facebook xx

Leave a Comment